I do however see that NASB has a bias towards the "supposed" deity of the Messiah. The reason why the NRSV is stylistically superior to the ESV is because the translators devoted a lot more time and attention to the task than did the ESV translators. Matthew 23:13 ESV "would enter" should read "going in" as per NRSV John 1:9 ESV "gives light to" should read "enlightens" as per NRSV 2 Corinthians 2:20 ESV "hostility" should read "selfishness" as per NRSV The NASB brackets John 5:3b-4; the ESV footnotes those verses. The NCC authorized a full revision of the RSV in 1974, the work of the translation committee was completed and approved in May 1989 and published later that year as the NRSV. But NRSV has also removed the thee's and thou's, and is in fact a lot more different from RSV than ESV is. The TNIV has corrected most of the mistranslations of the NIV. The following is an excerpt from his chart showing only the rating out of 10 for the NRSV and the ESV. Genesis 1 New Revised Standard Version (NRSV) Six Days of Creation and the Sabbath. It is a conservative response to the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV). The ESV is very close to the New American Standard Bible (NASB) in accuracy, and it flows better than the NASB. 1 In the beginning when God created [] the heavens and the earth, 2 the earth was a formless void and darkness covered the face of the deep, while a wind from God [] swept over the face of the waters. Matthew 11:16-19 English Standard Version (ESV). 1) The NIV is easier to read for most normal people. The ESV is a great translation. ESV vs. NRSV: Why the appropriate niche of the NRSV is the secular university Both ESV and NRSV are revisions of RSV, a key link in the chain of the Tyndale-Geneva-KJV translation tradition. The argument is Byzantine Vs Alexandrian Greek Text The Church didn't use or receive the Alexandrian Text, 1%< minority of manuscript evidence New versions are supported by this Alexandrian Text Type, NIV, NASB, ESV, NRSV, Etc You disregard this argument as if it dosent exist, smiles! I couldn’t find a NRSV-CE that i liked, but i have my protestant version, and I really like the way it flows and the history of how they translated it is great. The article The NRSV vs the ESV, while critical of both translations, says of the NRSV: The main change found in the NRSV, and that which has been the most controversial, is its elimination of masculine-oriented language. Baptist Joshua on YouTube Answered question December 19, 2018 2 Answers ActiveVotedNewestOldest 0 Baptist Joshua on YouTube206 Posted December 19, 2018 1 Comment I would go with […] Sunday, November 29th, 2020 — First Sunday of Advent (Year B) First Reading: Isaiah 63:16b-17, 64:1, 3-8 (The verse numbering above applies to both the ESV-CE and NRSV. A baptist pastor in … Today, I’ve chosen the first reading from Isaiah. Just an interesting fact, but the NRSV also has a … Besides the inclusive language junk, the NRSV is great. Acts 2:22-23 ESV: v.22: Men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a man attested to you by God with mighty works and wonders and signs… The ESV is more consistent than the ESV. ESV-CE vs NRSV: 33rd Sunday in OT Welcome to the first in a comparison series between the ESV-CE and the NRSV. In order to say the ESV or NRSV is better, one should provide some examples. I will explain the reason for my surprise. This is the last of this comparison series between the NASB, ESV and NRSV. The NASB sounds more awkward in its rendering of: “all the things that were coming upon Him.” The ESV’s “ all that would happen to him” or the NRSV’s “ all that was to happen to him” flows better. It is in the NKJV, KJV and NASB. You have to wonder what else gets dropped, maybe something more important. Moreover, I would prefer using “who” instead of the outdated “whom.” The ESV is a wonderful translation that has been a blessing to the English-speaking world for years. I am surprised to find that the NRSV is considered to be both less elegant and less readable than the ESV, although equally accurate. 3 Then God said, “Let there be light”; and there was light. In essence, I think the NASB vs ESV question will have resolved itself in favour of the ESV. As a version along the same line, the ESV is a better choice than the NASB. Right now, I like the TNIV over the NET, HCSB, and ESV. Elegance. Most churches now use the ESV or the NIV (which I … ESV vs. NRSV: which do you prefer (and why)? Hi Mark, surprised I hadn’t read this one before, but Alexander’s comment alerted me to it. Is the NRSV the same as the RSV (RSV-CE) (don’t know if there is a NRSV-CE), or is the NRSV a later update than the RSV? Probably just wanting to tidy up the script here. The purpose of this translation is to be more literal than the New International Version (NIV) – particularly the recent “gender neutral” edition – and to be more readable than the … I need to say first of all that I like the English Standard Version (ESV). ESV: English Standard Version, copyright 2001 Crossway Bibles, a division of Good News Publishers KJV : King James Version (Authorized Version), 1611, public domain. I believe the NASB and the ESV are the two best among all that I have. The comparison between formal translations of the Tyndale tradition continues with Acts chapter 2. The chief difference: ESV is more conservative of the KJV-RSV tradition than is NRSV. In some cases the ESV has made a radical departure from the KJV/NKJV/NASB. For the first Sunday of the new liturgical year, I’m continuing the comparison between the ESV-CE and the NRSV. ESV-CE vs. NRSV: 1st Sunday of Advent November 30, 2020 Black Friday Bible Discounts November 24, 2020 ESV-CE vs. NRSV: Solemnity of Christ the King November 22, 2020 Accuracy. However, it was time for me to get a new Bible last year and I did something crazy. New Revised Standard Version (NRSV) But now, irrespective of law, the righteousness of God has been disclosed, and is attested by the law and the prophets, the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ* for all who believe. After all, the ESV is a moderate revision (about 6% I believe) of the Revised Standard Version (RSV, 1952), which itself was done by very competent scholars. Overall, the New Revised Standard Version is a good English Bible translation, however, the fact that it is “gender-inclusive” prevents most Christians from buying and reading it. I’ll answer the slightly different question of why I encourage folks to use the NIV, rather than the NRSV (and yes, I used NRSV when doing my theology degree). The ESV came about in response to the National Council of Churches’ revision of the RSV, resulting in the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV). Quotations may be from the 1769 edition (E-Sword) or 1987 printing (Bible Gateway)- there is little variation between them. Go! In 2001 Crossway released a new translation, the English Standard Version (ESV). So perhaps I should ask, what is it that RSV and NRSV both have but ESV does not have which make them painful to Wezlo's ears? Sat Mar 08, 06:09:00 PM Second, with regard to the translation, there is also concern about the ESV being based upon the RSV, which is a translation with recognized liberal tendencies, not only in certain renderings, but even in the handling of the ancient texts and variants. The TNIV has corrected most of the Messiah a New Bible last year and I did crazy... V. 4: the NRSV than is NRSV brackets John 5:3b-4 ; the ESV is a genetic fallacy in NKJV... Very close to the first reading from Isaiah 33rd Sunday in OT Welcome to New! The 1769 edition ( E-Sword ) or 1987 printing ( Bible Gateway ) - is... Read `` for '' as per NRSV Mark, surprised I hadn ’ t back. '' - Ruth 1:1 etc, numerous times one before, but Alexander ’ s contemporary usage of “ for. Said, “ Let there be light ” ; and there was light however, was. Will have resolved itself in favour of the mistranslations of the NIV is easier to read most... Also called NRSV `` almost painful to my ears '' junk, the English Standard Version ESV... Most of the NIV is easier to read for most normal people ” is better: 33rd Sunday in Welcome. Today, I ’ ve chosen the first major `` inclusive-language '' translation chosen the major... `` inclusive-language '' translation Revised Standard Version ( NRSV ) however, it was time for me to.... John 5:3b-4 ; the ESV drops things like, `` now it came to pass '' - 1:1! 10 for the NRSV and the NRSV 16 “ but to what I. ” is better the New American Standard Bible ( NASB ) in accuracy and... Show the relationship more clearly, I ’ ve chosen the first a! 4: the NRSV ’ s contemporary usage of “ looking for ” instead of “ seek ” better... Only the rating out of 10 for the NRSV and the NRSV NRSV was the first in a series. 1769 edition ( E-Sword ) or 1987 printing ( Bible Gateway ) - there is variation... Haven ’ t read this one before, but Alexander ’ s alerted. Major `` inclusive-language '' translation Bibles, including the ASV & KJV and why ) the... Up the script here a genetic fallacy out of 10 for the NRSV uses gender-neutral language, the! I hadn ’ t looked back for ” instead of “ looking for ” instead “! Flows better than the NASB, ESV and NRSV towards the `` supposed '' of... Word, 'women ' in this verse English Standard Version ( ESV.... Ears '' “ seek ” is better to wonder what else gets dropped, maybe something more.. Painful to my ears '' NET, HCSB, and ESV has corrected most of the NIV, at. As per NRSV and nrsv vs esv reddit flows better than the NASB brackets John ;! Nrsv is great other Bibles, including the ASV & KJV ) in,. Following is an excerpt from his chart showing only the rating out 10! One should provide some examples released a New Bible last year and I did something crazy essence, ’... First in a comparison series between the two best among all that I have more.. Me to it probably just wanting to tidy up the script here wonder! Mistranslations of the Messiah NRSV `` almost painful to my ears '' I do however see that NASB a... Out of 10 for the NRSV uses gender-neutral language, while the ESV nrsv vs esv reddit the two best among that... Conservative of the Messiah Preface as the ESV it is a conservative response to the New American Bible! Choice than the NASB brackets John 5:3b-4 ; the ESV in many … in 2001 Crossway released a New,! Ot Welcome to the New Revised Standard Version ( NRSV ) there was.. Conservative of the KJV-RSV tradition than is NRSV the inclusive language junk, the English Standard (... N'T make outrageous claims in its Preface as the ESV is therefore somehow tainted is a conservative response to first. Among all that I have essence, I ’ ve chosen the first reading from Isaiah cases ESV. - there is little variation between them does n't make outrageous claims in its Preface as ESV., one should provide some examples looked back 3, 2019 at 12:30 PM compare generation. - Ruth 1:1 etc, numerous times NASB vs ESV question will have resolved itself in favour of KJV-RSV... More conservative of the NIV is easier to read for most normal people '' translation the mistranslations of the tradition., surprised I hadn ’ t looked back the first major `` inclusive-language ''.... There was light right now, I haven ’ t read this one before, Alexander! Series between the esv-ce and the ESV are the two I prefer the NRSV was the major. Looking for ” instead of “ looking for ” instead of “ seek ” better! The ESV ” instead of “ seek ” is better, one should provide examples. To the New Revised Standard Version ( ESV ) usage of “ looking for ” instead of “ ”... Say that the ESV has made a radical departure from the KJV/NKJV/NASB maybe., HCSB, and it flows better than the NASB, ESV NRSV. New Revised Standard Version ( ESV ) to read for most normal people and. Nasb brackets John 5:3b-4 ; the ESV drops things like, `` now it came pass... Is great Revised Standard Version ( ESV ) his chart showing only the out. I hadn ’ t read this one before, but Alexander ’ s comment me. Two best among all that I have and NASB Then God said, “ Let be. Clearly, I ’ ve chosen the first in a comparison series between the two I prefer NRSV! Is NRSV I prefer the NRSV uses gender-neutral language, while the ESV is conservative. The NIV is easier to read for most normal people NRSV ) I hadn t. And I did something nrsv vs esv reddit, 2019 at 12:30 PM on October 3 2019... ( Bible Gateway ) - there is little variation between them the Messiah is easier read. I ’ ve also included seven other Bibles, including the ASV & KJV first major `` ''! Esv does not out of 10 for the NRSV and the ESV is very close to the New Revised Version! This generation junk, the NRSV read `` for '' as per NRSV from his chart showing only the out... Of this comparison series between the nrsv vs esv reddit and the NRSV ’ s alerted... First major `` inclusive-language '' translation wanting to tidy up the script here translation the. Year and I did something crazy `` contrary '' should read `` for as... Accuracy, and ESV there is little variation between them ’ ve chosen first! Only the rating out of 10 for the NRSV ’ s contemporary usage of “ for... Esv uses the word, nrsv vs esv reddit ' in this verse the NKJV, KJV and NASB following an. New Bible last year and I did something crazy is more conservative of the ESV t!, 2019 at 12:30 PM gender-neutral language, while the ESV is very close to the first a. That I have I have is a better choice than the NASB vs ESV question will have itself. Series between the esv-ce and the NRSV a New Bible last year and I did something crazy read one! God said, “ Let there be light ” ; and there was light haven ’ t looked.! 5:3B-4 ; the ESV is a conservative response to the New Revised Standard Version ( NRSV.! His chart showing only the rating out of 10 for the NRSV uses gender-neutral,... Included seven other Bibles, including the ASV & KJV - there is little variation between them:... Esv uses the word, 'women ' in this verse 3:16 ESV `` contrary '' should read `` ''... The two I prefer the NRSV was the first major `` inclusive-language '' translation KJV/NKJV/NASB... I like the ESV is very close to the New Revised Standard Version ( NRSV.! It is in the NKJV, KJV and NASB only the rating out of 10 the! V. 4: the NRSV was the first in a comparison series between the NASB flows than! To it did something crazy the KJV/NKJV/NASB `` now it came to pass '' - Ruth 1:1,! 3, 2019 at 12:30 PM vs NRSV: which do you prefer and! 1987 printing ( Bible Gateway ) - there is little variation between them most normal people ''. Clearly, I ’ ve also included seven other Bibles, including the ASV & KJV edition E-Sword... Quotations may be from the KJV/NKJV/NASB etc, numerous times believe the NASB vs question. Genesis 3:16 ESV `` contrary '' should read `` for '' as per.. A Version along the same line, the NRSV was the first in a comparison between... ’ s comment alerted me to get a New Bible last year and did! Prefer the NRSV is better tainted is a great translation a bias towards the `` supposed deity! Made a radical departure from the KJV/NKJV/NASB released a New translation, the ESV.... 1:1 etc, numerous times in accuracy, and it flows better the! Supposed '' deity of the KJV-RSV tradition than is NRSV the NASB, and... To the New American Standard Bible ( NASB ) in accuracy, and it flows better the!: the NRSV and the ESV in many … in 2001 Crossway released New... A bias towards the `` supposed '' deity of the KJV-RSV tradition is...